Architecture & Cost Optimization

Digital Signage Storage Architecture: Cloudflare R2 vs AWS S3 vs EC2

September 4, 2025 Muhammad Asif Javed 9 min read
Diagram of players pulling media from CDN backed by R2 or S3, with EC2-origin variant
Digital signage players fetch from CDN; origin choice affects cost, durability, and ops.

Quick Summary

Key Points/Decision Snapshot

  • Use object storage + CDN by default. R2 minimizes surprise bills via zero egress; S3 integrates tightly with CloudFront and AWS tooling.
  • Cost drivers: storage $/GB-month, internet egress, request/operation costs, cache hit ratio, and operational overhead.
  • Durability: both R2 and S3 publish 11×9 durability; EC2-origin durability depends on your EBS/replication design.
  • Avoid if: You need sub-origin compute on R2/S3 (then add Workers@Edge/Lambda@Edge) or you can’t tolerate any vendor edge dependence.

Introduction

Digital signage fleets push heavy media (images/video) to thousands of players. The storage architecture you choose determines your cost curve and operational risk. This decision compares Cloudflare R2, AWS S3, and an EC2-origin pattern through the lens of pricing (2024–2025), durability, CDN fit, and day-2 operations.

📋 Context

  • Global players with high cacheability and periodic content refresh
  • CDN in front of origin is assumed
  • Measured by $/GB-month, $/GB egress, request/ops pricing, and operational overhead

For Comparison: Options Deep Dive

Option A — Cloudflare R2 (Object Storage)

Strengths:

  • Zero egress fees from R2 (pair naturally with Cloudflare CDN). Storage ~$0.015/GB-month; reads/writes billed as Class B/A ops. (Cloudflare)
  • 11×9 durability; S3-compatible API. (Cloudflare Docs) Trade-offs:
  • Pay per read operation (Class B) which matters for many small objects; plan for request coalescing and CDN caching. (Reddit)
  • Feature depth (analytics, event notifications) differs from S3 ecosystem.

Option B — AWS S3 (Object Storage)

Strengths:

  • Mature ecosystem, S3→CloudFront origin fetch $0; S3 Standard ~$0.023/GB-month (us-east-1 representative). (Amazon Web Services, Inc.)
  • 11×9 durability, 99.99% availability design target; broad tooling (Lifecycle, Replication, EventBridge). (AWS Documentation) Trade-offs:
  • Internet egress billed via CloudFront DTO tiers; request pricing can dominate for image-heavy playlists.

Option C — EC2-origin (Compute + Block Storage)

Strengths:

  • Full control: custom authentication, on-the-fly transcodes, watermarking at origin. Trade-offs:
  • You pay EC2 hours + EBS (~$0.08/GB-month gp3) + internet egress tiers (first 10TB ≈ $0.09/GB). Ops overhead: patching, autoscaling, failover, IPv4 address charges (since 2024). (Cloudchipr)

For Analysis: Deep Exploration

Durability & Availability

  • R2 and S3 both publish 99.999999999% durability. S3 Standard targets 99.99% availability; R2 enterprise SLO cites 99.9% monthly uptime. For signage, the CDN masks short origin blips, but long outages affect cache misses and refreshes. (Cloudflare Docs)

CDN Coupling & Egress

  • R2: no egress fees from origin simplify budgeting; you still pay Cloudflare CDN rates for delivery. S3: S3→CloudFront fetch is $0; you pay CloudFront egress and requests to viewers. EC2-origin: standard AWS internet DTO tiers apply from EC2 if you bypass CloudFront or use multi-CDN; with CloudFront, origin fetch from EC2 is also $0 DTO but you still run servers. (Cloudflare)

Requests/Operations

  • R2: Class B (reads) ≈ $0.36 per million; Class A (mutations) ≈ $4.50 per million. S3: per-1k GET/PUT pricing varies by class/region. EC2: no per-object op costs, but load balancer/L7 costs + instance CPU. For signage, optimize for larger bundles and high CDN hit ratio. (Cloudflare)

Costed Scenario (Realistic)

Assumptions: 2,000 players, avg 3 GB updates/player/month (images+few videos) = 6 TB/month delivered; 95% CDN hit ratio; origin bytes = 5% = 300 GB/month; object count ~1.2M GETs/day.

  • R2 (origin): Storage 5 TB @ $0.015 ≈ $75/mo; Reads: say 36M Class B/mo ≈ $12.96; Mutations 2M Class A ≈ $9.00; Egress: $0 (origin). CDN delivery billed separately. (Cloudflare)
  • S3 (origin): Storage 5 TB @ $0.023 ≈ $115/mo; S3→CloudFront origin fetch $0; S3 request charges apply per 1k GET/PUT; viewer egress billed in CloudFront. (AWS Documentation)
  • EC2-origin: Two m7g.large in ASG (price not modeled here), EBS 5 TB gp3 @ ~$0.08/GB-mo ≈ $400/mo storage; origin egress to CloudFront $0; to internet (multi-CDN) follows EC2 DTO tiers (first 10TB ≈ $0.09/GB). Ops overhead non-trivial. (Cloudchipr)

Implication: With high CDN hit ratios, origin egress is small but not zero. R2’s $0 egress simplifies multi-CDN or direct-from-origin edge cases. S3 integrates best if you are AWS-centric and already standardized on CloudFront.

For News: Event Analysis (Pricing updates 2024–2025)

  • AWS introduced/clarified free S3→CloudFront DTO ($0). EC2 and other services share the standard internet egress tiers (first 10TB @ ~$0.09/GB in many regions). Cloudflare R2 emphasizes zero egress in 2025 docs and adds storage classes (Standard/IA). (Amazon Web Services, Inc.)
Matrix plotting storage cost vs egress predictability vs operations burden
R2 minimizes egress; S3 maximizes ecosystem depth; EC2 maximizes flexibility at ops cost.

Decision Framework (for comparison type)

Criterion Cloudflare R2 AWS S3 EC2-origin Weight Notes
Storage $/GB-mo ~$0.015 ~$0.023 ~$0.08 (EBS gp3) 0.25 Representative us-east-1; EC2 includes server cost too. (Cloudflare)
Origin egress fees $0 $0 to CloudFront; else DTO tiers DTO tiers 0.25 R2 zero egress simplifies multi-CDN; S3→CF $0. (Cloudflare)
Request/ops pricing Class A/B billed GET/PUT billed None per object 0.15 High object counts favor bundling. (Cloudflare)
Durability/availability 11×9 / ~99.9% SLO 11×9 / 99.99% target Depends on your design 0.2 S3/R2 similar durability. (Cloudflare Docs)
Operational overhead Low Low High 0.15 EC2 requires scaling/patching.

Recommendation by scenario

  • Cloudflare stack / multi-CDN / unpredictable egressR2
  • AWS-native stack / IaC & observability on AWSS3 + CloudFront
  • Custom origin logic or specialized transformsEC2-origin, fronted by CloudFront

Practical Guidance

When to use:

  • R2 when your fleet is on Cloudflare CDN or you plan multi-CDN; you want predictable bills and can tune for Class B ops.
  • S3 when most infra is in AWS; you’ll front with CloudFront and leverage native tools (Lifecycle, Replication, events).
  • EC2-origin for custom per-request logic or legacy apps requiring POSIX access.

Common Pitfalls:

  • Underestimating request/operation costs on object stores (batch small images; use manifests; increase cache TTLs). (Cloudflare)
  • Ignoring origin availability: even with CDN, purge waves and cold caches hit origin hard—use rate limiting and staggered invalidations.
  • Forgetting IPv4/EIP charges on EC2 and DTO tiers when bypassing CloudFront. (Cloudchipr)

Real-World Example

A retail network (1,500 screens) updates a 2.5 GB media pack weekly (≈150 TB/yr delivered). With a 96% CDN hit ratio and multi-region players:

  • R2+Cloudflare: $0 egress from origin; storage and Class B dominate; costs scale cleanly with object count.
  • S3+CloudFront: S3 storage + request + CloudFront DTO; origin fetches free; good CloudWatch/athena visibility.
  • EC2-origin+CloudFront: workable but ops-heavy; pays for servers 24/7; failover adds complexity. Choose only if you need on-origin dynamic transforms.

Conclusion

For digital signage, default to object storage + CDN. Choose Cloudflare R2 for zero-egress simplicity and multi-CDN agility. Choose AWS S3 if you are AWS-centric and will use CloudFront (origin fetch $0). Keep EC2-origin for edge cases requiring bespoke origin logic.

Next steps:

  1. Estimate monthly origin bytes (post-CDN) and object counts.
  2. Run both providers’ calculators with your cache policies.
  3. Pilot in one region with synthetic cache-busts to validate request/egress assumptions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which origin is cheapest at scale for signage video delivery?

If most traffic goes via Cloudflare CDN, R2 often wins due to zero egress fees; you still pay Class B read ops. On AWS with CloudFront, S3 can be competitive because S3→CloudFront origin fetch is free and CloudFront handles internet egress; pricing then depends on CloudFront DTO + request rates. ([Cloudflare][1])

Is durability comparable between R2 and S3?

Yes. Both publish 11 nines (99.999999999%) durability figures. Availability SLAs differ (e.g., R2 enterprise SLO 99.9%, S3 design target 99.99% for S3 Standard). ([Cloudflare Docs][4])

When should I consider EC2-origin?

Use EC2-origin when you need bespoke logic at origin (e.g., per-request watermarking, hardware codecs, proprietary auth flows) and are comfortable managing scaling, patching, and egress costs. Otherwise prefer object storage + CDN. EC2 internet egress uses standard AWS tiers starting around $0.09/GB. ([Amazon Web Services, Inc.][5])

References & Citations

  1. [1]
    Cloudflare R2 pricing
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Amazon S3 durability & availability
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04
  6. [6]
    Cloudflare R2 durability
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04
  7. [7]
    Amazon EC2 data transfer pricing tiers
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04
  8. [8]
    Amazon EBS pricing (gp3 ~$0.08/GB-month)
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04
  9. [9]
    Cloudflare R2 storage classes (2025)
    official-docs Accessed: 2025-09-04

Share

About the Author

Muhammad Asif Javed - Full-Stack Developer & WebRTC Expert

Muhammad Asif Javed

Full-Stack Developer & WebRTC Expert | 10+ Years Experience

Muhammad Asif Javed is a seasoned Full-Stack Developer with over 10 years of experience specializing in WebRTC, real-time communication systems, and enterprise-grade platforms. He has architected and delivered solutions across cybersecurity, educational technology, digital signage, and interactive display systems for clients worldwide.